Trump’s first authoritarian test will be… TikTok???
So Trump has said that he supports TikTok in the past. Also, Trump is anti-China everything. There will be mayhem among young people and creators if TikTok goes offline in America, which it’s scheduled to do the day after Trump is inaugurated. Will the incoming dictator have the power to turn it around or will he celebrate this as an accomplishment of some sort?
From the article:
“American lawmakers and intelligence officials have said that TikTok poses a national security threat under ByteDance. They say that the Chinese government’s oversight of private companies would allow it to use the app to retrieve sensitive information about Americans or to spread propaganda, though they have not publicly shared evidence that this has occurred. They have also noted that apps like Facebook and YouTube are banned in China and that the country does not allow TikTok there.”
New York Times: TikTok Faces U.S. Ban After Losing Bid to Overturn New Law
This Feels Like the Opening Scene of a Horror Movie
Small outbreak in a remote area of a foreign nation. Incoming president to the most powerful nation in the world dismisses all scientists and puts an anti-vaxxer in charge of healthcare agencies. Funding for international monitoring organizations dries up. The script kind of writes itself…
From the article:
“At least 79 people have died from an unknown disease that is causing flu-like symptoms in south-western Democratic Republic of Congo, the health ministry says. The health ministry says the majority of people who have died are between the ages of 15 and 18. More than 300 people have been infected with patients exhibiting symptoms like fever, headaches, runny noses and coughs, breathing difficulties and anaemia.”
BBC: Unknown flu-like disease kills at least 79 people in DR Congo
Cowards in Robes
The Supreme Court appears ready to punt on the issue of transgender care. Suddenly, they’re not scientists. Huh.
From the article:
“This Supreme Court, dominated by a 6-3 majority of Republican appointees, doesn’t usually take such a modest posture toward government regulation. But when it does, it’s often in cases that will allow a state to implement a constitutionally questionable and partisan-motivated policy. If Wednesday’s case, United States v. Skrmetti, is decided this way, it will be one in a line of decisions where the court deferred to state legislatures so it could avoid facing the constitutional deficiencies those same lawmakers created.”
Mother Jones: John Roberts Has a Plan to Deny Transgender Rights