So It Begins. With the Help of Democrats No Less.
Years ago we wrote about the dangers of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) under Obama, which slipped in vague but dangerous language about organizations deemed to be âsupportiveâ of terrorism. Congress is on target to codify similar language into legislation that gives the Trump administration broad powers to criminalize non-profit organizations at its âdiscretion.â
From the article:
âUnder the new bill just passed by the House, criteria for designations of âterrorismâ are vague. If it passes the Senate and is signed into law, the Treasury Secretary would have broad discretion in the lawâs enforcement and wouldnât be required to share related evidence. The law could chill free speech by creating financial pressure on organizations that rely on their tax-exempt status to operate effectively. Under the Treasuryâs discretion, the bill could be wielded against projects backed by political or corporate interests; for example, groups like WE ACT who oppose oil and gas development could be accused of obstructing critical infrastructure.â
The Lever: GOP Takes First Steps To Shut Down Climate Groups
What Happens in Sri Lanka Better Not Stay In Sri Lanka!
Look. Iâm not saying it could happen here, butâŚThere are signs of hope in other parts of the world. People are still inspired by the teachings of yesterday and how they can inform the movements of today.
From the article:
âThe NPP is a cross-class electoral front launched five years ago by the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP, Peopleâs Liberation Front). While the JVP began its life as a revolutionary Marxist-Leninist party and still formally subscribes to that ideology, the NPP has positioned itself on the center left. The incoming governmentâs priorities, according to JVP general secretary Tilvin Silva, are âdeveloping the country, eradicating corruption, and enhancing democracy with accountability.ââ
Jacobin: Sri Lankaâs People Have Kicked Out the Old Political Class
Same Sex Marriage Under Trump: More Questions Than Answers
There appear to be some trap doors in marriage equality, but no one knows for sure how the Trump administration could go about upending the Supreme Court protections.
From the article:
âBut while the Supreme Court rulings and the Respect for Marriage Act law apply to governmental rights and benefits, their reach is more limited in the private sector. If bakers or website designers want to deny services to gay couples based on their religious beliefs, for example, they might continue to try â but those actions would fall under state anti-discrimination laws. Many private employers â including Catholic nonprofits â who have denied benefits to their employeesâ same-sex partner, would be subject to employment discrimination regulations.â
New York Times: Should Gay Couples Worry About Their Benefits Under Trump?