The Abortion Chess Match Continues
Multiple court cases and question marks abound in the ongoing effort to prevent abortion access in the nation. The private sector took an important step forward this week with the announcement that CVS and Walgreens are to begin distributing abortion pills in certain states where it is legal. This will obviously set up new fights and arguments, but itâs an effective short-term solution given the effort to crack down on mailing pills. Itâs hard to predict where the courts are going to wind up on the myriad challenges that exist. Not perfectâŚbut at least this buys a little time.
From the article:
âIt is uncertain how much initial demand there will be for the service at brick-and-mortar pharmacies. In the states where the chains will begin dispensing, abortion pills are already available in clinics or easily prescribed through telemedicine and sent through the mail. But some women prefer to visit doctors, many of whom do not have the medication on hand. The new development will allow doctors and other eligible providers to send a prescription to a pharmacy for the patient to pick up.â
New York Times: CVS and Walgreens Will Begin Selling Abortion Pills This Month
Weâre Not the Only Ones Having This Discussion
Dissent published a roundtable discussion among its writers Sheri Berman, Andre Pagliarini, Zachariah Mampilly and Nick Serpe. From the introduction:
âThis conversation, held in October, brings together scholars who focus on different regions in order to help us understand the challenges that left political formations and popular movements face around the world. What do they hold in common? Where do their perspectives diverge? What brought them to this pointâand where are they headed?â
From the article:
âThat parties can be clientelistic and corrupt, that they can be vehicles for individuals without any ties to or desire to represent the grassrootsâthose criticisms are valid, and they hold in Europe as well, which has a longer history of parties and electoral democracy. But the question is: do we want to throw the baby out with the bath water? Itâs true that parties can have a negative impact on democracy, but can we imagine well-functioning democracy without something resembling political parties? That question does not have a clear answer to me. Parties have historically provided the link between citizens and the government; they aggregate interests, mobilize voters, provide information flows back and forth, and come up with multifaceted political agendas. Social movementsâwhich tend to focus on a single interest or single groupâdonât have the same structure or function.â
Dissent Magazine: Parties and Movements: A roundtable discussion on the challenges that left-wing political formations face around the world.
Itamar Ben-Gvir Called Them âHeroesâ
Not that we need more evidence of the depravity that exists in Israelâs halls of power. But here it is. After the slaughter of more than 100 Palestinian civilians lining up for flour, Israelâs national security minister called the IDF soldiers who shot women and children in the heads and chests âheroes.â
From the article:
âIsraeli tanks ran over dead and wounded bodies. Many victims were brought to hospitals in donkey carts, as ambulances could not reach the scene to collect all the dead and wounded.
âThe scene resembled a slaughterhouse. Most of the victims were children. A heartbroken mother was heard screaming through the crowds: âMy girl is gone; sheâs been starving for seven days.â A woman at Kamal Adwan hospital was pleading with the world: âWe are under siege. Take pity on us. Ramadan is coming soon. People should look at us. Pity us.ââ
The Jacobin: Israelâs Flour Massacre in Gaza Is a Horrific War Crime